Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 SW2D 597 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably State v. Thomas (1970), Bosler v. Swenson (1966)

2 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

26019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Murphy · State v. Watson · State v. Reagan · State v. Schrum · State v. Weindorf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The general guide for testing the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence is whether the facts and circumstances relied upon by the State are consistent with each other and with the hypothesis of defendant’s guilt, and are inconsistent and irreconcilable with his innocence, and point so clearly and satisfactorily to his guilt that they exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. (Cases cited).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “no incriminating circumstances other than suspicious conduct and an opportunity on the part of the defendant and his companions to commit the theft. These circumstances alone are not inconsistent and irreconcilable with the defendant’s innocence and do not point so clearly and satisfactorily to guilt as to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.