Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 SW3D 666 - State v. Mendoza

State v. Mendoza’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso))

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Ornelas v. United States · Guzman v. State · State v. Ross · Wiede v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “made all possible implied findings of fact that are supported by the record,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “need not presume, assume, or guess at what historical facts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “findings of fact with greater specificity”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.