Grant v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Newman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[TJhis court has held that claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are not cognizable in a coram-nobis proceeding. Such claims are properly brought pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1. Ineffective-assistance claims are outside the purview of a coram-nobis proceeding, and a petition for writ of error coram nobis is not a substitute for proceeding under Rule 37.1. | ^Appellant has in no way met his burden of demonstrating why this court should overrule its prior case law to expand the categories of error that may be addressed in a coram-nobis proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.