Local 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. National Labor Relations Board’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
518 federal appellate · 21 district · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 743 later decisions (52 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2018 · most notably Amalgamated Association of Street Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America v. P Lockridge (1971), National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc. (1972)
518 federal appellate · 21 district · 36 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
reviewedLocal 357, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Radio Officers' Union of the Commercial Telegraphers Union v. National Labor Relations Board · Republic Aviation Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. American National Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 743 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ome conduct may by its very nature contain the implications of the required intent,”
24 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(b) It shall be an unfair labor practice for a labor organization or its agents — "(1) to restrain or coerce (A) employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 157 of this title: Provided, That this paragraph shall not impair the right of a labor organization to prescribe its own rules with respect to the acquisition or retention of membership therein * * * "(2) to cause or attempt to cause an employer to discriminate against an employee in violation of subsection (a) (3) of this section or to discriminate against an employee with respect to whom membership in such organization has been denied or terminated on some ground other than his failure to tender the periodic dues and the initiation fees uniformly required as a condition of acquiring or retaining membership * * *.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Employees shall have the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection, and shall also have the right to refrain from any or all of such activities except * * *.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.