Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 365 U.S. 708 - Smith v. Bennett

Smith v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

937
cited by 937 later decisions
102
cited 102 times by the Supreme Court
37
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

278 federal appellate · 66 district · 295 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 937 later decisions (102 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably North Carolina v. Alford (1970), Fay v. Noia (1963)

278 federal appellate · 66 district · 295 state decisions — followed in 37 states

35401961197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Bowen v. Johnston · Burns v. Ohio · Tom Tong

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 937 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if one does not have it and is unable to get it the fee might as well be [an exorbitant sum].”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “to interpose any financial consideration between an indigent prisoner of the State and his exercise of a state right to sue for his liberty is to deny that prisoner the equal protection of the laws.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The Attorney General of Iowa also argues that indigent prisoners in the State’s custody may seek ‘vindication of federal rights alleged to have been denied by the state’ in the federal courts. But even though this be true — an additional point not involved or passed upon here — it would ill-belioove this great State, whose devotion to the equality of rights is indelibly stamped upon its history, to say to its indigent prisoners seeking to redress what they believe to be the State’s wrongs: ‘Go to the federal court.’ * * *” 365 U. S., at p. 713 , 81 S. Ct., at p. 898 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.