Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 A.2d 865 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1989
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5601

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Turner v. United States · Barnes v. United States · United States v. Gainey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. even should an ‘explanation’ appear in the evidence, the existence of an explanation does not require an acquittal should the jury be justified in concluding beyond a reasonable doubt, in light of all the evidence and despite the explanation, that defendant is guilty. (Emphasis in original).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.