Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 Ark. 456 - McEwing v. State

McEwing v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Springs v. State (2006), Edison v. State (2015)

26 state decisions

160200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. State · McGehee v. State · Bailey v. State · Huddleston v. State · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Subject to constitutional limitations, the prosecuting attorney shall, upon request, be informed as soon as practicable before trial of the nature of any defense which defense counsel intends to use at trial and the names and addresses of persons whom defense counsel intends to call as witnesses in support thereof.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[ THE COURT ]: Okay. Well, what I'll do is this. I'll let the State talk to both the witnesses, Janelle-what is her last name? [ DEFENSE COUNSEL ]: Young. [ THE COURT ]: Young and Annette McGee. I'm not going to-if the State won't allow you all-if you all can't prepare a response to the-to their testimony, I'm going to exclude Janelle Young. If McGee, Annette McGee is in the file, then I'll allow her to testify, but I'll exclude Janelle Young if the State doesn't-if they can't, because they may want to do her record or find out on that. It's just unfair. You can't do that. I won't allow it unless the State has had a chance to talk to the witness and if it feels that it can adequately do a cross examination then I'll allow it. But otherwise I'm not going to allow that witness to testify. All right. .... [ THE COURT ]: Did you guys have a chance to talk to the other witness? [ DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY ]: Your Honor, we've had so many problems getting our own witnesses here. [ THE COURT ]: Okay. All right. I'll allow the one witness, the mother. [ DEFENSE COUNSEL :] Okay. For the record, I would like to state that I think, you know, they could've called and checked or had their office in the five hours, four hours that we've been here and call ACIC at least and check and see if she had any record or anything like that. [ THE COURT :] All right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.