Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 Ark. 615 - Holsombach v. State

Holsombach v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rose Care, Inc. v. Jones · Murphy v. Dumas · Hickson v. Arkansas Department of Human Services · Hairgrove v. Oden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The appellant must request the extension; 2. Notice must be provided to the appellee; 3. All parties must have the opportunity to be heard; and 4. The circuit court must make findings to support an extension.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.