Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 F.2d 690 - Time, Inc. v. Manning

Time, Inc. v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

366 F.2d 690 · 1966

Citation profile

192
cited by 192 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 192 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co. (1977), Securities & Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. (1978)

31 federal appellate · 12 district · 3 state decisions

540196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1400 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Fourco Glass Company v. Transmirra Products Corporation · People's Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 192 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “anywhere within the territorial limits of the state in which the district court is held ...,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The plaintiff's statutory privilege of choosing his forum is a.factor,.held.in varying degrees of esteem, to be weighed against other factors in determining the convenient forum. 1 Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure (Wright Ed.) § 863. At the very least, the plaintiff’s privilege of choosing venue places the burden on the defendant to demonstrate why the forum should be changed. ‘Plaintiff’s privilege to choose, or not to be ousted from, his chosen forum is highly esteemed.’ Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Ins. Co., 5 Cir. 1962, 311 F.2d 429, 434 .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.