Cogdell v. Wyeth’s Empirical Analysis
366 F.3d 1245 · 2004
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2025
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thermtron Products, Inc. v. Hermansdorfer · United States v. Morton · Snapper, Inc. v. Redan · 74 1735 73 45285 11 594 Bethesda Memorial Hospital Inc · Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Medical Plan, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[r]emoval jurisdiction can be considered a 'species' of subject matter jurisdiction in that it defines a federal court's power to hear a particular kind of case-one that was originally brought in a state court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Notably, the [Eleventh Circuit] did not identify Section 1441 as a basis of subject matter jurisdiction. The [Eleventh Circuit] acknowledged that removal jurisdiction "can be considered a ‘species’ of subject matter jurisdiction,” but "a lack of removal jurisdiction [will] coincide with a lack of subject-matter jurisdiction” "[o]nly” when[, unlike in Courtney and also here,] "the case is not one over which the court has original jurisdiction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Except as otherwise' expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil' action brought in a State court 'of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and- division embracing the place where such action is pending.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.