Stevens v. Tamai’s Empirical Analysis
366 F.3d 1325 · 2004
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2020
12 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 119 · 35 U.S.C. § 120 · 35 U.S.C. § 135 · 35 U.S.C. § 2 · 35 U.S.C. § 363 · 35 U.S.C. § 371 · 35 U.S.C. § 372
Relies on In re Gartside · Merck & Co. v. Kessler · Hyatt v. Boone · Eli Lilly & Co. v. Board of Regents · Kawai v. Metlesics
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“establish regulations, not inconsistent with law, which — (A) shall govern the conduct of proceedings in the Office.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.