Juarez v. Menard, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
366 F.3d 479 · 2004
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Payne v. Pauley · Peters v. Forster · Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Traina · USA Life One Insurance v. Nuckolls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[e]vidence presented to defeat a summary judgment motion need not be in admissible form, but it must be admissible in content.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.