Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 F.3d 562 - El-Khader v. Monica

El-Khader v. Monica’s Empirical Analysis

366 F.3d 562 · 2004

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
December 2024
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably ANA International Inc. v. Way (2004), Yerkovich v. Ashcroft (2004)

32 federal appellate · 6 district ·

310200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 8 U.S.C. § 1153 (§ 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1154 (§ 204 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1155 (§ 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Iddir v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Tuong Huan Van Dinh v. Reno · Sheryl Smith Schoenfeld v. Kenneth S. Apfel · CDI Information Services, Inc. v. Reno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(2) Matters not subject to judicial review (B) Denials of discretionary relief Notwithstanding any other provision of law (statutory or nonstatutory), includ ing section 2241 of Title 28, or any other habeas corpus provision, and sections 1361 and 1651 of such title, and except as provided in subparagraph (D), and regardless of whether the judgment, decision, or action is made in removal proceedings, no court shall have jurisdiction to review— (ii) any other decision or action of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security the authority for which is specified under this subchapter to be in the discretion of the Attorney General or the Secretary of Homeland Security, other than the granting of relief under section 1158(a) of this title.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “may, at any time, for what he deems to be”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is apparent from the plain language of [§ 1155].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.