Phelps v. Alameda’s Empirical Analysis
366 F.3d 722 · 2004
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 53 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably Gonzalez v. Thaler (2012), Gonzalez v. Thaler (2012)
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Michigan v. Long · Powell v. McCormack · Harris v. Reed · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘rulings on jurisdictional issues do not bind a merits panel’ of this Court,” Phelps v. Alameda, 366 F.3d 722 , 728 n. 6 (9th Cir.2004) (quoting Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104 (9th Cir.1999)), and we maintain an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Phelps ... has exhausted all relevant state remedies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Phelps v. Alameida
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.