Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft

Filed April 26, 2004.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2004-04-26

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP (2009), Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft (2004)

7 federal appellate · 11 district · 3 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bodett v. Coxcom, Inc. · Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-04-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Jose A. Bracamonte, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

¶2Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service,.Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Phoenix, AZ, OIL, Anthony C. Payne, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

¶3Before HUG, B. FLETCHER, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

¶4ORDER

¶5The opinion in this appeal Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 356 F.3d 1015 (9th Cir.2004) filed January 26, 2004 is withdrawn. Supplemental briefing shall proceed as ordered.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Counsel

Jose A. Bracamonte, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region, Immigration & Naturalization Service,.Lagu-na Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Phoenix, AZ, OIL, Anthony C. Payne, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.