State v. James

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 24, 2012

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2012-08-24

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2016

1 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Defendant's Petition for Discretionary Review as amended is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for resentencing pursuant to [the new sentencing guidelines].”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 247 N.C. App. 350 - State v. James

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-08-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Defendant’s Petition for Discretionary Review as amended is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for resentencing pursuant to Article 93 of Chapter 15A of the General Statutes of North Carolina.

¶3The State’s Motion to Dismiss defendant’s Notice of Appeal is allowed. Defendant’s Motion to Continue or Hold in Abeyance Pending Resolution of Issues by the Supreme Court of the United States is dismissed as moot.

¶4By order of the Court in Conference, this 23rd day of August, 2012.

s/Jackson. J.

¶5For the Court