366 N.J. Super. 30 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
2 district · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council · Mickens v. Taylor · Greenman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the existence of an unadjudicated conflict is also detrimental to the independent interest of the court to be free from future unjustified attacks over the fairness of the proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]dherence to the Rules of Professional Conduct serves not only a client's interests but also the `broader societal interest [in] the integrity of the trial process itself.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“independent interest in assuring that conflict-free representation occurs, since the existence of conflict undermines the integrity of the [New Jersey] court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.