Borgen v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]his court interprets Shenandoah as standing for the proposition that the chapter 279 proceedings should be deferred once such proceedings have been initiated by the recommendation of the superintendent and the teacher has elected to pursue resolution of the dispute concerning his termination through the negotiated procedures of the collective bargaining agreement. Any other read ing of the Shenandoah case could result in the type of “inconsistent decisions,” “duplicate proceedings,” and “unnecessary hearings” to’ be avoided under the Shenandoah guidelines.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Board of Directors v. Banke