Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 P.2d 770 - Perrymore v. State

Perrymore v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 1969
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 96 Okla. Crim. 301 - Kittrell v. State · Wilkerson v. State · 65 Okla. Crim. 299 - Haskette v. State · Bow v. State · 50 Okla. Crim. 169 - Stanley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We believe the rule is well settled in Bow v. State, Okl.Cr., 273 P.2d 141 , wherein this court in the body of the opinion quoted from Kittrell v. State, [96] Okl.Cr. [301], 253 P.2d 853, 855 , wherein it was stated: ‘This court is cognizant of the seriousness of the offense which was committed by the defendant and that such criminal offenses are on the increase in Oklahoma and particularly in the areas of large population. The Legislature in its wisdom has provided that where a robbery is committed with firearms, the punishment in extreme cases could be the death penalty. * * * We feel that the imposition of these severe penalties will cause the robbers to shun Oklahoma but until they know that the punishment which will be meted out to them will be severe and certain, they will probably continue to terrorize our citizens.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where the evidence of the state and the defendant is in direct conflict and the evidence of the state is sufficient to sustain a conviction, the Criminal Court of Appeals will not, in absence of error of law, reverse a conviction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.