Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 P2D 957 - Goodnight v. State

Goodnight v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1982
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1982

10 state decisions

60196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 35 Okla. Crim. 414 - Queen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This court has been consistent in its, holdings that though there may be a conflict in the testimony it is the province of the jury to weigh the testimony and: ferret out the truth and where there is competent evidence upon which the jury could base their verdict it will not be disturbed on appeal.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.