Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

366 So. 2d 758

Docket No. 52311.

Ringel v. State

Donald Lee RINGEL, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 9, 1978.

Rehearing Denied February 15, 1979.

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1978-11-09

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1996

9 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Do the provisions of Section 39.02(5)(c) of the Florida Statutes relating to the treatment of juvenile offenders as adults apply to violations of the law the penalty for which includes but may also be less than life imprisonment?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including 589 So. 2d 362 - Tomlinson v. State

Relies on 352 So. 2d 88 - Ringel v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1978-11-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Richard E. Mandell and Michael Sigman, Orlando, for petitioner.

¶2Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Basil S. Diamond, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

¶3*759 Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender; and Jerry L. Schwarz, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for defendants Jay Dean Mitchell, Thomas Heyden Wright, Jr., Robert William Armentrout, William B. Beaver, Joseph J. Santarsiere, Michael L. Fulghum, Robert Allen Northwick, Gamal A. Elahrag and Michael L. Hopson, amicus curiae.

¶4ADKINS, Justice.

¶5This cause is here on Petition for Writ of Certiorari reported by certificate of the District Court of Appeal, 4th District, that its decision reported in 352 So.2d 88 is one which involves a question of great public interest. See Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution.

¶6The question certified as being of great public interest is as follows:

"Do the provisions of Section 39.02(5)(c) of the Florida Statutes relating to the treatment of juvenile offenders as adults apply to violations of the law the penalty for which includes but may also be less than life imprisonment?"

¶7We answer this question in the affirmative and also hold that a juvenile indicted and convicted as an adult, Section 39.02(5)(c), Florida Statutes (1975), is subject to the statutory minimum sentencing provision of Section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1975).

¶8We approve and adopt the opinion of the District Court of Appeal.

¶9It is so ordered.

¶10ENGLAND, C.J., and BOYD, OVERTON and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur.

/366/so2d/758 · .json · Public domain