Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 SW2D 153 - Rice v. Davis

Rice v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
June 2003
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2003 · most notably King v. Commonwealth (1965), Ayers v. Davis (1964)

4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

17019631970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Diggs v. Welch · Smith v. Henson · Thomas v. District of Columbia · Tompsett v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are changing the rule in Kentucky applicable to habeas corpus, so that it will conform to the federal rule, noted above. Therefore, to the extent our former holdings on this subject are in conflict with this opinion they are overruled.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.