Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 S.W.2d 374 - State v. McBride

State v. McBride’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
October 1985
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 1985

14 state decisions

70196319701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Whitaker · State v. Shipman · State v. Farris · State v. Hedgpeth · State v. Worley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Court instructs the jury that if you believe and find from the evidence in this case, beyond a reasonable doubt, that-at the County of Jackson and State of Missouri, on the 3rd day of November, 1967, the defendant herein, CHARLES WILLIAM WHITE, did then and there feloniously and burglariously break into and enter the- storeroom of Greenlease Cadillac, a corporation, located at 2921 Gillham Road, Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri, by bursting and breaking the rear office window of said storeroom, if you find he did break and enter the said storeroom, and if you further believe and find from the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant fe-loniously and intentionally did steal property of any value, the property of Green-lease Cadillac, without the consent of the said Greenlease Cadillac, with intent to permanently deprive the said Greenlease Cadillac, of said property, with felonious intent to convert the same to his own use without any honest claim to said property, if such be your finding, then you will find the defendant guilty of Stealing and so find in your verdict. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.