Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 SW2D 63 - State v. Ciarelli

State v. Ciarelli’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2019

9 state decisions

40196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Watson · State v. Harris · State v. Harold · State v. Hicklin · State v. Deyo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every person who shall buy, or in any way receive, with intent to defraud, any property that shall have been stolen from another, knowing the same to have been stolen, shall, upon conviction, be punished in the same manner and to the same extent as for the stealing of the property so bought or received.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.