Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 SW2D 646 - Cook v. Jaynes

Cook v. Jaynes’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1996

10 state decisions

401963197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gulbenkian v. Penn · Haginas v. Malbis Memorial Foundation · Isbell v. Kenyon-Warner Dredging Co. · Essex County Acceptance Corp. v. Pierce-Arrow Sales Co. · Dial Temp Air Conditioning Company v. Faulhaber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We make the same disposition of appellant’s point that the summary judgment should not have been granted until appellant’s special exceptions had been acted upon. We agree that the proper, orderly manner for trial courts to dispose of such matters is to pass on objections to pleadings before rendering judgment, but there is nothing in this record to indicate that appellant called these exceptions to the trial court’s attention or requested action thereon. If he did not do so, the exceptions were waived. Rule 90, Vernon’s Texas R.C.P.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.