Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 366 SW2D 698 - Flock v. Kelso

Flock v. Kelso’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 1979
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Tindall v. Tacconelly · Carnes v. Kay · UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE CO. v. Baggett · Dallas Fountain and Fixture Company v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) Points of Error. A statement of the points upon which the appeal is predicated shall be stated in short form without argument and be separately numbered. In parentheses after each point, reference shall be made to the page of the record where the matter complained of is to be found. Such points will be sufficient if they direct the attention of the court to the error relied upon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.