Daugherty v. TELEK’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on New York v. Hill · Duncan v. O'NAN · In re the Estate of Rougeron · Maryland Board of Nursing v. Nechay · Fischer v. Fischer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] court's power to affect its own judgment within ten days of entry or after the filing of a notice of appeal is this latter category: jurisdiction over a particular case. Such questions go more accurately to the propriety of the exercise of jurisdiction rather than to the existence of jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A court, once vested with subject matter jurisdiction over a case, does not suddenly lose subject matter jurisdiction by misconstruing or erroneously overlooking a statute or rule governing the litigation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“). See Hisle v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County Gov't, 258 S.W.3d 422 , 429-30 (Ky. App. 2008). We have often noted, most recently in Harrison v. Leach, 323 S.W.3d 702 , 705-06 (Ky. 2010) (quoting Duncan v. O'Nan, 451 S.W.2d 626 , 631 (Ky. 1970) ), that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.