State v. Norfolk’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Mapp v. Ohio · Beck v. State of Ohio · United States v. Arvizu · State v. Rousan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he facts and reasonable inferences from such facts are considered favorably to the trial court's ruling and contrary evidence and inferences are disregarded.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In determining whether the seizure and search were unreasonable, a court must determine whether the officer’s action was justified at'its inception, and whether it was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place. In evaluating reasonable suspicion, courts must determine if the content of the information possessed by the police and its degree of reliability is sufficient to create a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Reed
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.