¶1 ORDER
¶2 Jamie Faulkner appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorándum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of *86 law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (6).