Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 A.2d 624 - Pendry v. State

Pendry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 2001

4 state decisions

201976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. People of the State of Illinois · Draper v. Washington · Lindh v. O'HARA · State Ex Rel. Butler v. Allen Circuit Court · Moore v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not lost by an indigent [appellant] who has parents financially able to pay the expenses of appeal”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““As indigents, the defendants are entitled, at public expense, to all or such portions of the transcript of their trial as may be necessary to their appeals. Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 , 76 S.Ct. 585 , 100 L.Ed. 891 (1956); Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487 , 83 S.Ct. 774 , 9 L.Ed.2d 899 (1963). That right is not lost by an indigent defendant who has parents financially able to pay the expenses of appeal, State v. Allen Circuit Court, 241 Ind. 627 , 174 N.E.2d 411 (1961), or the fees of privately-retained counsel, Arline v. State, Fla.App., 277 So.2d 791 (1973). There seems to be no issue as to the necessity for the entire trial transcript in this very serious criminal case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.