McNabb v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Johnson v. Dawson (2010), Chandler v. Martin (2014)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ottens v. State · Hagen v. State · Henyan v. Peek · Velek v. State (City of Little Rock) · Clark v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A party may take an appeal from the district court by filing a certified copy of the district court’s docket sheet, which shows the awarding of judgment and all prior entries, with the clerk of the circuit court having jurisdiction over the matter. Neither a notice of appeal nor an order granting leave to appeal shall be required. The appealing party shall serve a copy of the certified docket sheet upon counsel for all other parties, and any party proceeding pro se, by any form of mail that requires a signed receipt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“when a statute is ambiguous, ... we must interpret it according to the legislative intent, and its review becomes an examination of the whole act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.