In Re Beckerle’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
January 2013
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on In Re Alexander · In Re Jass · In Re McGuire · In Re Schanuth · In Re Fuger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For purposes of this subsection, the term “disposable income” means current monthly income received by the debtor ... less amounts reasonably necessary to be expended....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Puetz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.