United States v. Nikrasch’s Empirical Analysis
367 F.2d 740 · 1966
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 96 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2013 · most notably Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973), United States v. Watson (1975)
63 federal appellate · 2 district · 18 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Johnson v. Zerbst · Mapp v. Ohio · Henry v. United States · Preston v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Since the arrested defendant was then in custody * * * and had not been apprised of his Fourth Amendment rights, the trial court correctly observed that no true consent had been given”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“too remote in time or place to have been made as incidental to the arrest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.