Mid-Continent Metal Products Co. v. Maxon Premix Burner Co.’s Empirical Analysis
367 F.2d 818 · 1966
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1990
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fourco Glass Company v. Transmirra Products Corporation · Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc. · Union Asbestos & Rubber Company, by Change of Name Unarco Industries, Inc. v. Evans Products Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“patent venue provisions are not to be construed liberally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.