Singh v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
367 F.3d 1182 · 2004
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Mohammed v. Gonzales (2005), Avagyan v. Holder (2011)
13 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Shobna Chandar Lata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Iturribarria v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · LOZADA · Rodriguez-Lariz v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the BIA could plausibly have held that [Ray] was [eligible for relief] based on the record before it,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“upon review of the record, we are not persuaded that the Immigration Judge's ultimate resolution of this case was in error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ray v. Gonzales · Ray v. Gonzales“erred as a matter of law when it recharacterized Singh's motion to reopen as a motion for reconsideration”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.