Hoque v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
367 F.3d 1190 · 2004
Citation profile
28 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Xiaoguang Gu v. Gonzales (2006), Movsisian v. Ashcroft (2005)
28 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Abderrahman Chebchoub v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Varsha Tushar Shah v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Borja v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Singh v. Ilchert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the BIA adopts the decision of the IJ, we review the IJ's decision as if it were that of the BIA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Abebe v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.