Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 F.3d 194 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

367 F.3d 194 · 2004

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Engle (2012), United States v. Landeros-Lopez (2010)

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

190200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Russell v. United States · Hartman v. United States · United States v. DeFusco · United States v. Mitchell · United States v. Hooker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “demonstrate that the allegations therein, even if true, would not state an offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In light of the nature of Thomas’ argument, we are inclined to treat it as a challenge to the adequacy of the factual basis supporting his plea even though he has not explicitly framed it as such.”). 6 . Citing Jensen, we stated in United States v. Forrest, 1999 WL 436743 (4th Cir.1999):”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.