United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
367 F.3d 194 · 2004
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Engle (2012), United States v. Landeros-Lopez (2010)
3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Russell v. United States · Hartman v. United States · United States v. DeFusco · United States v. Mitchell · United States v. Hooker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“demonstrate that the allegations therein, even if true, would not state an offense.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“In light of the nature of Thomas’ argument, we are inclined to treat it as a challenge to the adequacy of the factual basis supporting his plea even though he has not explicitly framed it as such.”). 6 . Citing Jensen, we stated in United States v. Forrest, 1999 WL 436743 (4th Cir.1999):”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.