Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 F.3d 29 - United States v. Grace

United States v. Grace’s Empirical Analysis

367 F.3d 29 · 2004

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably United States v. Roberson (2006), United States v. Meléndez-Torres (2005)

39 federal appellate · 8 district · 2 state decisions

400200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Bailey v. United States · Glover v. United States · United States v. Natanel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “). Thus, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude that based on the proximity of the drugs, accessibility of the firearm, and the surrounding circumstances, a rational factfinder could conclude that - 44 - Pérez-Greaux possessed the firearm”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e draw all reasonable evidentiary inferences in harmony with the verdict and resolve all issues of credibility in the light most favorable to the government.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “de novo, evaluating whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.