Moisa v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
367 F.3d 882 · 2004
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 13 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably Garrison v. Colvin (2014), Benecke v. Barnhart (2004)
21 federal appellate · 13 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lorion · Bunnell v. Sullivan · 16155b Dar Morgan v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration · Wang He v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the ALJ has failed to provide legally sufficient reasons for rejecting such evidence, (2) there are no outstanding issues that must be resolved before a determination of disability can be made, and (3) it is clear from the record that the ALJ would be required to find the claimant disabled were such evidence credited.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Commissioner, having lost this appeal, should not have another opportunity to show that Moisa is not credible any more than Moisa, had he lost, should have an opportunity for remand and further proceedings to establish his credibility.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An individual shall be determined to be under a disability only if his physical or mental impairment or impairments are of such severity that he is not only un able to do his previous work but cannot, considering his age, education, and work experience, engage in any other kind of substantial gainful work which exists in the national economy.... For purposes of the preceding sentence (with respect to any individual), “work which exists in the national economy” means work which exists in significant numbers either in the region where such individual lives or in several regions of the country.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.