Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 F.3d 975 - Ngure v. Ashcroft

Ngure v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

367 F.3d 975 · 2004

Citation profile

234
cited by 234 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited

134 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 234 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Lie v. Ashcroft (2005), Sioe Tjen Wong v. Attorney General of United States (2008)

134 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1940200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same · Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 234 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is committed to agency discretion and not subject to judicial review.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In determining eligibility under CAT, `all evidence relevant to the possibility of future torture should be considered, including but not limited to: past torture inflicted upon the applicant; the applicant's ability to relocate to another area of the country where torture is unlikely; and gross, flagrant, or mass violations of human rights.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the infliction or threat of death, torture, or injury to one's person or freedom, on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.