Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 FSUPP 911 - Lowenschuss v. Kane

Lowenschuss v. Kane’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Charles G. Bluhdorn, Third-Party and Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc., Third-Party · The Kronprinzessin Cecilie · Dolman v. United States Trust Co. · Feder v. Harrington · General Aniline & Film Corp. v. Bayer Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On February 2, 1973, two things happened: (1) The management of A & P announced its opposition to the tender offer and indicated that it would take legal action to prevent the consummation of the tender offer; and (2) the plaintiff placed an order for 2000 shares of A & P stock, which order was executed in two transactions on the New York Stock Exchange. I make no finding as to which of these events took place first.1 Thereafter, but before February 13, 1973, plaintiff tendered the A & P shares in accordance with the G & W tender offer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““1. It should be of some interest to the appropriate body of the Pennsylvania Bar whether the plaintiff, a lawyer, truly purchased these shares as an investment for his pension plan or merely as a vehicle for this litigation in which counsel fees are sought.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(i)f this were the only action filed by this plaintiff, I might consider that it could be construed as including the Williams Act claims,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.