Mauk v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2012
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. · Smith v. Bell Telephone Co. · Tyson & Brother v. Banton · Baker v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the right ... to select [the] employee; (2) the right and power to remove the employee; (3) the power to direct what the employee will do and the manner of performance; (4) and the potential power to control the employee. [Citations omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.