Doe v. D'AGOSTINO’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Cannon v. University of Chicago · Collins v. City of Harker Heights · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn. · Smith v. Robinson · Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) the defendant intended to inflict emotional distress, or knew or should have known that emotional distress would likely result, 2) the defendant’s conduct was “extreme and outrageous” to the extent that it was “utterly intolerable in a civilized society”, 3) the defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiffs distress, and 4) the plaintiff sustained “severe” emotional distress.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.