367 F. Supp. 2d 245 - Frasure v. Principi’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 705 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 7121
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whichever route the employee chooses [under § 7121(d) ], she must then exhaust that administrative remedy before pursuing her claim in court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mustafa v. Iancu
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.