Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 Ill. App. 3d 729 - Troyan v. Reyes

367 Ill. App. 3d 729 - Troyan v. Reyes’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
2
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 377 Ill. App. 3d 447 - Werner v. Nebal (2007), 402 Ill. App. 3d 215 - JACKSON EX REL. JACKSON v. Reid (2010)

37 state decisions

190200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 141 Ill. 2d 40 - People v. Smith · 148 Ill. App. 3d 581 - Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc. · Skogen v. The Dow Chemical Company · 12 Ill. 2d 231 - People Ex Rel. Terry v. Fisher · River Dock & Pile, Inc. v. O & G Industries, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not give parties free rein to introduce medical records as a substitute for expert medical testimony. Like all business records, medical records may be excluded if they are not relevant or are too complex for the jury to understand on its own.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In order to fulfill the foundational requirements of a business record, it is not necessary that the author or creator of the record testify or be cross-examined about the contents of the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Relevant evidence, which tends to prove a fact in controversy or renders a matter in issue more or less probable, is generally admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.