Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 Md. 418 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Alston v. State (2010), 152 Md. App. 488 - Hudson v. State (2003)

34 state decisions

250200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 26 U.S.C. § 7214

Relies on Hamling v. United States · Roth v. United States · United States v. Powell · United States v. Dotterweich · Standefer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The essence of a criminal conspiracy is an unlawful agreement. The agreement need not be formal or spoken, provided there is a meeting of the minds reflecting a unity of purpose and design. In Maryland, the crime is complete when the unlawful agreement is reached, and no overt act in furtherance of the agreement need be shown.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““the doctrine of non-mutual collateral estoppel is inappropriate in criminal cases, primarily because of the nonmutuality of the parties in the two cases. The State would otherwise be deprived of its opportunity to litigate whether a specific defendant violated the laws in question, thus undermining the government’s important interest in the enforcement of its criminal laws.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.