Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 Md. 432 - Robinson v. Bunch

Robinson v. Bunch’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Dua v. Comcast Cable of Maryland, Inc. (2002), Lee v. Cline (2004)

56 state decisions

440200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 215 · 29 U.S.C. § 216

Relies on Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida · Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority · John Aldens v. Maine · Behrens v. Pelletier · Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Article 19. Remedy for injury to person or property. "That every man, for any injury done to him in his person or property, ought to have remedy by the course of the Law of the land, and ought to have justice and right, freely without sale, fully without any denial, and speedily without delay, according to the Law of the land.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “For good reason, it is rare that the Court will add an issue not raised by the parties in either the lower courts or this Court. As we observed in Robinson v. Bunch, 367 Md. 432, 440 , 788 A.2d 636, 641-42 (2002), however, "in circumstances where we have determined that the proper resolution of a case requires our consideration of certain matters not dealt with by the parties, we have, by order, added issues that were neither presented in certiorari petitions and cross-petitions nor raised in the courts below.” See also County Council v. Dutcher, 365 Md. 399, 405 , 780 A.2d 1137, 1140 (2001).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““held that ‘the Legislature may ordinarily substitute a statutory remedy, including a statutory administrative and judicial review remedy, for a common law remedy without violating Article 19 of the Declaration of Rights,’ Robinson v. Bunch, supra, 367 Md. at 446-447 , 788 A.2d at 645 .” Piselli 371 Md. at 207 , 808 A.2d at 519 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.