¶1For the reasons stated in State v. Ortiz-Zape,_N.C._,_, _ S.E.2d_,_(2013), the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded for consideration of the remaining issues on appeal.
¶2REVERSED AND REMANDED.
367 N.C. 80
State v. Hurt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 27, 2013
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 2013-06-27
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2014
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2013-06-27
View the full empirical analysis of this case →