Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 N.W.2d 546 - State v. Hopperstad

State v. Hopperstad’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
May 1997
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boland v. Morrill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether material exists which tends to negate evidence of defendant’s guilt. If, in the trial court’s discretion, the defendant’s needs outweigh the need for confí- dentiality of the reports, those portions of the file should lose their protection. The trial court cannot rule that the entire file is protected without first reviewing it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.