Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 367 P2D 730 - Cook v. State

Cook v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1978
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Young v. State · 74 Okla. Crim. 432 - Herren v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 158 - Sholes v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 92 - Ridenour v. State · Reid v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Ordinarily, error cannot be predicated on mere unexplained excerpts from remarks of counsel to jury, but enough must appear of record to advise appellate court of what preceded alleged objectionable remarks and their meaning to be deducted from the context, and whether or not they were invited or provoked by remarks made by opposing counsel.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where improper remarks are made, it is the duty of defense counsel to immediately impose an objection and to request an instruction that remarks are improper and not to be considered by the jury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.